![]() |
Information from A Document Not |

Disclaimer
- The names of the parties, as well as the data and information in the cases stated below, have been sanitized in order to protect the identity of the parties involved. The complexities of the cases have also been simplified to facilitate easy understanding of the key issues involved.
- Our expert's opinions do not necessarily reflect the views of the ICC or the ICC Commission on Banking Technique and Practice. No legal imputation should be attached to any of the contents of the cases and no legal responsibility is accepted for any errors, omissions or misleading statements or opinions caused by negligence or otherwise. Our expert's opinions are given for your reference only and you should not rely upon or act on our opinions, of which we are not held liable. You should consult your legal counsel or other experts for their opinions in your specific cases.
- No case can be reproduced in whole or in part without our express written permission.
An Applicant v. An Issuing Bank
A letter of credit (L/C) with payment available at the counter of the issuing bank and subject to the UCP 500 called for goods of country A origin. In the commercial invoice, the packing list, the bill of lading, the insurance certificate, the certificate of inspection and the certificate of origin, the goods was of country A origin. A copy (not original) of the export declaration in country A, not called for in the L/C, was nevertheless presented, probably due to negligence of the documentation clerk during the Christmas high season, together with the other stipulated documents. It indicated that the goods was assembled in country B. The beneficiary made a timely presentation to the issuing bank through a presenting bank, which was the beneficiary's banker.
The issuing bank, after due consideration, paid the beneficiary.
The applicant refused to take up the documents due to discrepancies in the export declaration in respect of the country of origin of the goods
- not being consistent with the other documents;
- also not complying with the L/C requirements; and
- that the export declaration presented was not an original.
The applicant also suspected that there was a fraudulent country of origin for the goods shipped.
Before the issuing bank affecting payment, we were retained by the issuing bank to provide our expert's opinions on the issues.
Opinions: ...
![]() |
(905) 237-6465 | ![]() |
(905) 237-6867 |
|